Single-Sensor Based MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems
Abstract
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques are most famous application in photovoltaic system to track the maximum power of the PV system. Usually, most of maximum power point tracking algorithms used fixed step and two variables: the photovoltaic (PV) array voltage (V) and current (I). Therefore both PV array current and voltage have to be measured.  The maximum power point trackers that based on single variable (I or V) have a great attention due to their simplicity and ease in implementation, compared to other tracking techniques. With traditional perturb and observe algorithm based on two variable (I and V) using fixed iteration step-size, it is impossible to satisfy both performance requirements of fast response speed and high accuracy during the steady state at the same time. To overcome these limitations a new algorithm based on single variable method with variable step size has been investigated which has been implemented using fuzzy logic control. The proposed method has been evaluated by simulation using MATLAB under different atmospheric conditions. The obtained results show the effectiveness of the proposed technique and its ability for practical and efficient tracking of maximum power.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
T. Tafticht, K. Agbossou, M. Doumbia, et al, “An improved maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic systemsâ€, Renewable Energy, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 1508-1516, July 2008.
G. Cesare, D. Caputo, A. Nascetti, “Maximum power point tracker for portable photovoltaic systems with resistive-like loadâ€, Solar Energy, Vol. 80, No. 8, pp. 982-988, Aug. 2006.
V. Scarpa, S. Buso, G. Spiazzi, “Low-complexity MPPT technique exploiting the PV module MPP Locus Characterizationâ€, IEEE trans. On Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, No. 5, pp.1513-1538, May 2009.
N. Femia, D. Granozio, et al, “Predictive& adaptive MPPT perturb and observe methodâ€, IEEE trans. Aerosp. Electron Syst., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 934-950, July 2007.
E. Koutroulis, K. Kalaitzakis, and N. C. Voulgaris, “Development of a microcontroller-based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system,†IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–54, Jan. 2001.
W. Xiao and W. G. Dunford, “A modified adaptive hill climbing MPPT method for photovoltaic power systems,†in Proc. 35th Annu. IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., 2004, pp. 1957–1963.
J.-M. Kwon, B.-H. Kwon, and K.-H. Nam, “Three-phase photovoltaic system with three-level boosting MPPT control,†IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2319–2327, Sep. 2008.
Abdourraziq, M. A., Ouassaid, M., & Maaroufi, M. (2014, November). Comparative study of MPPT using variable step size for photovoltaic systems. In Complex Systems (WCCS), 2014 Second World Conference on (pp. 374-379). IEEE.
Abdourraziq, M. A., Ouassaid, M., Maaroufi, M., & Abdourraziq, S. (2013, October). Modified P&O MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems. In Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 2013 International Conference on (pp. 728-733). IEEE.
A. Pandey, N. Dasgupta, and A. K. Mukerjee, “High-performance algorithms for drift avoidance and fast tracking in solar MPPT system,†IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 681–689, Jun. 2008.
V. Salas, E. Olias, A. Barrado, and A. Lazaro, “Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems,†Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells, vol. 90, pp. 1555–1578, 2006.
Abdourraziq, M. A., Ouassaid, M., & Maaroufi, M. (2014, October). A fuzzy logic MPPT for photovoltaic systems using single sensor. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), 2014 International (pp. 52-56). IEEE.
Amine, A. M., Mohamed, M., & Mohammed, O. (2014, April). A new variable step size INC MPPT method for PV systems. In Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 1563-1568). IEEE.
K. H. Hussein, I. Muta, T. Hoshino, and M. Osakada, “Maximum photovoltaic power tracking: an algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions,†IEE Proc., Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 142, pp. 59–64, 1995.
A. Safari and S. Mekhilef, “Simulation and hardware implementation of incremental conductance MPPT with direct control method using cuk converter,†IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1154–1161, Apr. 2011.
B. Alajmi, K. Ahmed, S. Finney, and B.Williams, “A maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded photovoltaic systems in microgrids,†IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., to be published.
K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, M. Amjad, and S.Mekhilef, “An improved particle swarm optimization (PSO)–Based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation,†IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 3627–3638, Aug. 2012.
Hohm, D. P. and Ropp, M. E., “Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithmsâ€, Progress in Photovoltaics: Res. Appl., 2003, 11 pp. 47-62.
Salas, V., Olias, E., Lazaro, A. and Barrado, A. “New algorithm using only one variable measurement applied to a maximum power point trackerâ€, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Volume 87, Issues 1-4, May 2005, pp. 675-684.
Mohammed A. Elgendy, Bashar Zahawi, "Assessment of the Incremental Conductance Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm", IEEE Transactions on sustainable energy, Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2013.
M. A. Farahat, H. M. B. Metwally, A. Ahmed, and E. Mohamed “Optimal choice and design of different topologies of DC-DC converter used in PV systems, at different climatic conditions in Egypt,†Renewable Energy, vol. 43, pp. 393-402, 2012.
Dasgupta, N., Pandey, A. and Mukerjee, A.K., Current-Sensor-Based Photovoltaic MPP Tracking Algorithm with Efficient Dynamic Response, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) 2008, China
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v6i2.3828.g6845
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Online ISSN: 1309-0127
Publisher: Gazi University
IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);
IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.
WEB of SCIENCE in 2025;
h=35,
Average citation per item=6.59
Last three Years Impact Factor=(1947+1753+1586)/(146+201+78)=5286/425=12.43
Category Quartile:Q4