Comparative Efficiency Assessment Of MPPT Algorithms In Photovoltaic Systems

Hong Viet Phuong Nguyen, Thanh Tung Huynh, Van Tan Nguyen

Abstract


Algorithms of maximum power point tracking are widely used in most of photovoltaic systems to optimize the output power which depends on ambient conditions such as solar irradiance and PV arrays’ temperature. In general, these techniques can be classified into two categories: conventional algorithms including Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC), and artificial intelligence algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In this investigation, a survey of these algorithms is conducted to analyze, compare and assess their performances when they are integrated in a PV power system under dynamic changed conditions. The simulation results obtained from MATLAB/Simulink environment show that the dynamic performances of intelligent MPPT controller are much better than those of P&O and INC algorithms.

Keywords


Photovoltaic; MPPT; P&O; INC; Artificial Neural Network

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shrivastava, D. K. Saini and M. Pandit, “Distribution Grid Parameter Variation due to Solar PV Power Integration”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, Vol.10, No.3, pp. 1125-1132, September, 2020.

Dolara, “Energy comparison of seven MPPT techniques for PV systems,” J. Electromagn. Anal. Appl., Vol. 01, pp. 152–162, Jan. 2009.

Reza Reisi, M. Hassan Moradi, and S. Jamasb, “Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: A review”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 19, pp. 433–443, Mar. 2013.

Hua and C. Shen, “Comparative study of peak power tracking techniques for solar storage system”, APEC ’98 Thirteenth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, vol. 2, pp. 679–685, 1998.

Bendib, F. Krim, H. Belmili, A. Fayçal, and B. Sabri, “An intelligent MPPT approach based on neural-network voltage estimator and fuzzy controller, applied to a stand-alone PV system”, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, pp. 404–409, 2014.

N. Nguyen, V. T. Nguyen, M. Q. Duong, K. H. Le, H. H. Nguyen, and A. T. Doan, “Propose a MPPT Algorithm Based on Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for Improving Photovoltaic System Operation”, Front. Energy Res., Vol. 8, p. 14, 2020.

N. Nguyen, V. K. Pham, V. T. Nguyen, D. H. Hoang, T. B. T. Truong, and H. V. P. Nguyen, “A New Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for the Photovoltaic Power System”, Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on System Science and Engineering, pp. 159 – 163, 2019.

M. Q. Duong, V. T. Nguyen, G. N. Sava, M. Scripcariu and M. Mussetta, "Design and simulation of PI-type control for the Buck Boost converter", 2017 International Conference on ENERGY and ENVIRONMENT (CIEM), pp. 79-82, 2017.

Y. Singh and A. S. Chauhan, “Neural networks in data mining”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 5(6), pp. 36-42, 2009.

Mellit and S. A. Kalogirou, “Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: a review”, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 34(5), pp. 574 - 632, 2008.

K. Jain, J. Mao and K. M. Mohiuddin, “Artificial neural networks: a tutorial”, Computer, Vol.29(3), pp. 31 – 44, March 1996.




DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v12i4.13481.g8565

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 1309-0127

Publisher: Gazi University

IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);

IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.

WEB of SCIENCE in 2025; 

h=35,

Average citation per item=6.59

Last three Years Impact Factor=(1947+1753+1586)/(146+201+78)=5286/425=12.43

Category Quartile:Q4