Optimization of Operating Parameters of Diesel Engine Powered with Jatropha Oil Diesel Blend by Employing Response Surface Methodology
Abstract
Biodiesel is promoted as an appropriate alternative fuel for use in compression ignition (CI) engines as it is non-toxic, biodegradable, and sulphur-free and does not require any change in current engines design. The key objective of this experimental study is to evaluate the best operational parameters of engine referring to performance and emissions of Jatropha biodiesel powered CI engine by employing response surface methodology (RSM). In order to achieve maximum brake power (BP), brake thermal efficiency (BTE) and to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) and unburnt hydrocarbon (HC) emissions the optimization model is used. Effects of different factors such as fuel injection pressure (FIP), engine compression ratio (CR), and load on thermal performance have been studied in a single cylinder diesel engine. Experiments design was based on L20 orthogonal array Central composite design (CCD) method. RSM was employed to test the suitability of biodiesel in diesel engines and models were developed by using experimental results. Based on the optimization, the optimum engine parameters found were 18 CR, 180 bar FIP and 8.11 kg engine load. Under these settings, the optimum responses were found as 2.21 kW, 28.24%, 25.3 ppm and 174.6 ppm for BP, BTE, HC, and NOx, respectively. Meanwhile, R2 (coefficient of determination) values were found as 99.96%, 99.93%, 98.5%, 99.14%, and 99.78%, for BP, BTE, net heat release rate (NHRR), HC, and NOx, respectively.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. S. Silitonga, A. E. Atabani, T. M. I. Mahlia, H. H. Masjuki, I. A. Badruddin, and S. Mekhilef, “A review on prospect of Jatropha curcas for biodiesel in Indonesia,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 8,pp.3733–3756,2011,
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.011.
Y. Datta Bharadwaz, B. Govinda Rao, V. Dharma Rao, and C. Anusha, “Improvement of biodiesel methanol blends performance in a variable compression ratio engine using response surface methodology,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1201–1209, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.04.006.
H. F. Abdelraheem, A. Lang, and M. E. A. Elsayed, “Jatropha curcas: A viable alternative source of clean energy to meet Sudan’s growing energy demand,” Proc. - 2013 Int. Conf. Comput. Electr. Electron. Eng. ’Research Makes a Differ. ICCEEE 2013, pp. 287–293, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICCEEE.2013.6633949.
V. Kumar and R. K. Saluja, “The effect of operating parameters on performance and emissions of DI diesel engine fuelled with Jatropha biodiesel,” Fuel, vol. 278, no. April, p. 118256, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118256.
S. Semwal, A. K. Arora, R. P. Badoni, and D. K. Tuli, “Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 2151–2161, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.080.
S. Tayari, R. Abedi, and A. Rahi, “Comparative assessment of engine performance and emissions fueled with three different biodiesel generations,” Renew. Energy, vol. 147, pp. 1058–1069, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.068.
B. V Bharat, “Performance and emission study of Mahua oil ( madhuca indica oil ) ethyl ester in a 4-stroke natural aspirated direct injection diesel engine,” vol. 30, pp. 1269–1278, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2004.09.010.
S. H. Ghosh, “Synthesis of biodiesel from oils of jatropha,karanja and putranjiva to utilize in Ricardo VCR engine and its performance and emission measurement,” Proc. Therm. Eng. Conf., pp. 731–8, 2008.
Ü. A?bulut, M. Ayy?ld?z, and S. Sar?demir, “Prediction of performance, combustion and emission characteristics for a CI engine at varying injection pressures,” Energy, vol. 197, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117257.
A. A. S. A. El-gharabawy, “Cost Analysis for Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Plant in Egypt,” Int. J. SMART GRID, vol. 1, no. 1, 2017.
K. K. Radha, A. A. Kumari, S. N. Sarada, E. L. Nagesh, and K. Rajagopal, “Alternative fuels for a single cylinder direct injection diesel engine,” Proc. - 1st Int. Conf. Emerg. Trends Eng. Technol. ICETET 2008, pp. 1083–1088, 2008, doi: 10.1109/ICETET.2008.261.
M. Mofijur, H. H. Masjuki, M. A. Kalam, and A. E. Atabani, “Evaluation of biodiesel blending, engine performance and emissions characteristics of Jatropha curcas methyl ester: Malaysian perspective,” Energy, vol. 55, pp. 879–887, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.059.
M. El-Kasaby and M. A. Nemit-Allah, “Experimental investigations of ignition delay period and performance of a diesel engine operated with Jatropha oil biodiesel,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 141–149, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2012.12.006.
A. Singh, S. Sinha, A. K. Choudhary, H. Panchal, M. Elkelawy, and K. K. Sadasivuni, “Optimization of performance and emission characteristics of CI engine fueled with Jatropha biodiesel produced using a heterogeneous catalyst (CaO),” Fuel, vol. 280, no. June, p. 118611, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118611.
A. Pandhare and A. Padalkar, “Investigations on Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine with Biodiesel ( Jatropha Oil ) and Its Blends,” vol. 2013, 2013.
H. Patel, V. Rajai, P. Das, S. Charola, A. Mudgal, and S. Maiti, “Study of Jatropha curcas shell bio-oil-diesel blend in VCR CI engine using RSM,” Renew. Energy, vol. 122, pp. 310–322, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.071.
S. Uslu, “Optimization of diesel engine operating parameters fueled with palm oil-diesel blend: Comparative evaluation between response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN),” Fuel, vol. 276, no. April, p. 117990, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117990.
M. K. Parida, H. Joardar, A. K. Rout, I. Routaray, and B. P. Mishra, “Multiple response optimizations to improve performance and reduce emissions of Argemone Mexicana biodiesel-diesel blends in a VCR engine,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 148, pp. 1454–1466, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.061.
S. Jain and M. P. Sharma, “Prospects of biodiesel from Jatropha in India: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 763–771, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.005.
S. Raj and M. Bhandari, “ Comparison of Methods of Production of Biodiesel from Jatropha Curcas ,” J. Biofuels, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 58, 2017, doi: 10.5958/0976-4763.2017.00009.5.
Y. S, A. W, B. A, C. LF, and M. NA, “Oil Extraction From Calophyllum inophyllum L. via Soxhlet Extraction,” ResearchGate, pp. 1–6, 2015.
A. Singh, S. Sinha, A. K. Choudhary, and H. Chelladurai, “Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalyst, application of Taguchi robust design and response surface methodology to optimise diesel engine performance fuelled with Jatropha biodiesel blends,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01430750.2020.1789741.
A. Sharma, Y. Singh, A. Tyagi, and N. Singh, “Sustainability of the polanga biodiesel blends during the application to the diesel engine performance and emission parameters—Taguchi and RSM approach,” J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 42, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40430-019-2102-3.
Y. Singh, A. Sharma, G. Kumar Singh, A. Singla, and N. Kumar Singh, “Optimization of performance and emission parameters of direct injection diesel engine fuelled with pongamia methyl esters-response surface methodology approach,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 126, no. October, pp. 218–226, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.035.
T. S. Singh and T. N. Verma, “Taguchi design approach for extraction of methyl ester from waste cooking oil using synthesized CaO as heterogeneous catalyst: Response surface methodology optimization,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 182, no. October 2018, pp. 383–397, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.077.
R. R. Neela Rajan, R. Rajesh, and M. R. Elayidom, “Optimization of production of transesterified Jatropha curcas oil using Response Surface Methodology,” 2016 Int. Conf. Energy Effic. Technol. Sustain. ICEETS 2016, pp. 187–193, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICEETS.2016.7582923.
M. Venkatraman and G. Devaradjane, “Experimental investigation of effect of compression ratio, injection timing and injection pressure on the performance of a CI engine operated with diesel-pungam methyl ester blend,” Proc. Int. Conf. Front. Automob. Mech. Eng. - 2010, FAME-2010, pp. 117–121, 2010, doi: 10.1109/FAME.2010.5714814.
N. K. Singh, Y. Singh, A. Sharma, and E. A. Rahim, “Prediction of performance and emission parameters of Kusum biodiesel based diesel engine using neuro-fuzzy techniques combined with genetic algorithm,” Fuel, vol. 280, no. June, p. 118629, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118629.
A. Dhar and A. K. Agarwal, “Performance , emissions and combustion characteristics of Karanja biodiesel in a transportation engine,” Fuel, vol. 119, pp. 70–80, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.002.
C. Patel, A. K. Agarwal, N. Tiwari, S. Lee, C. S. Lee, and S. Park, “Combustion, noise, vibrations and spray characterization for Karanja biodiesel fuelled engine,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 106, pp. 506–517, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.025.
A. Mejiá, M. Leiva, A. Rincón-Montenegro, A. Gonzalez-Quiroga, and J. Duarte-Forero, “Experimental assessment of emissions maps of a single-cylinder compression ignition engine powered by diesel and palm oil biodiesel-diesel fuel blends,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 19, no. December 2019, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100613.
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v11i2.11808.g8172
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Online ISSN: 1309-0127
Publisher: Gazi University
IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);
IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.
WEB of SCIENCE in 2025;
h=35,
Average citation per item=6.59
Last three Years Impact Factor=(1947+1753+1586)/(146+201+78)=5286/425=12.43
Category Quartile:Q4